This is a 2002 movie adaptation of Charles Dicken’s third
novel. Dickens is able to bring out the stark black and white images of ‘good”
and “bad” in his novels. The Victorian idiom enables these “passion play”
imagery.
Ralph Nickleby is the
personification of evil or to use its Indian equivalent “adharma”. Nicholas Nickleby the honorable nephew is “good” or “dharma”. The story is essentially a tale
of the triumph of good over evil.
As I was watching the movie, I
could not help but speculate on the parallels between Nicholas Nickleby and the
Mahabharath! Both are tales that
describe the travils of dharma as it is put down continuously by evil. The
pandavas are personified in Nicholas and Kate. The insults thsat Kate undergoes
in Ralph’s house from his evil friends are similar to the famous scene where
Draupadhi is dishonored in public in Duryodhana’;s court. Just as we have
Vikarna and Vidhur who try to counsel evil, we have a friend of Ralph’s who not
only advises Ralph and hios cronies to desist but also feels guilty for not
having spoken up! We even have a “pair of Krishna
equivalents” in the Cheerybyl brothers.
The comparison rose up naturally
in my mind and there is no contrivance here. I think this only proves the
essential fact that the fight between good and evil, the initial victory of the
latter and the eventual triumph of the former are essential themes deeply
embedded in the human consciousness so as to transcend cultures and continents.
Of course, in the complicated world we have cocreated, there are no convenient
pegs for hanging good and evil. Our times are more Elizabethean than Victorian!
There is a lot of grey!
But, the real battle between the
forces of dharma and adharma is happening
outside but inside each one of us! Each one of us has a little bit of both
Ralph and Nicholas in us. The battle within is the Kurukshetra. It is both a
Dharmakshetra and Kurukshetra. It is Kurukshetra because we can’t transcend our
own inner evil by inaction. It is only by action that we help dharma to emerge
victorious.
Action is neither good nor bad.
It is the coin of life. We exchange time for action. We accumulate karma with
action! To stop acting is itself an action! “So, Act!” says Krishna. But, act
within the framework of love and good. Any action that is prompted by a general
desire for doing well by everyone including oneself and that is rooted in love
and a sincere commitment not to harm others by thought, words or action is
preferable over inaction.
We wonder why evilis victorious.
We wonder whether good will triumph at all! Yet, the Lord has promised to
return whenever there is a threat that good will be totally destroyed. How much
more should evil win before the balance is irretrievably tilted and the cosmic
force in irreversibly released in the final battle against evil?
No comments:
Post a Comment